We can't make important decisions based on small samples. Believing that Sogard is a long-term upgrade based on a few games is akin to believing that Nelson is now a stud #1 based on his last couple of outings. Let Sogard ride out this hot streak while half our team is injured, but he'll drop back to what we expected when we picked him up. He's capable of being an okay placeholder, but not someone for the long-term plans. Villar has a chance of becoming an above average MLB player, so we need to ride out his bad start to see if he can get things going. 25% of a season is not enough time to make that determination when he has some history of being better. I could see him getting some extra days off, or moving him down in the order, but he should remain our starting 2B. His potential upside benefit for this team, both now and for the future, is too high for us to replace him with someone with little present value and basically no future value in Sogard. .. and I think this is likely what is being suggested. If we happened to bring Sogard up at the exact time he is seeing the ball extremely well and it coincides at a time when Villar is pressing, then it might be a great time to let Villar breathe a bit. I certainly understand letting someone work their way out of a slump but it is also just as likely that someone could develop bad habits that take months to repair. Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t think anyone is suggesting replacing Villar permanently. But a week of limited use or careful use can be constructive.