brewcrewdue80
-
Posts
7,254 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
News
2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking
Milwaukee Brewers Videos
2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks
Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks
2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks
The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project
2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by brewcrewdue80
-
Both teams to keep it tied and go 15-18innings straining their bullpens and 6th SP eventually.
-
Houser isn't at a 3year FA contract level at this moment. He's more at the 1+mutual Option type FA contract. His role was to become a RP this season. And now we're back at SP. If we see an extension this offseason I'd figure they pay him his last season of Arb and put a mutual option to it. Maybe sounds like an in-season deal. He's a swing man pitcher at the moment. Your best comp would probably be Carlos Villanueva who fit that role that I believe got a deal at some point with the Cubs...tanking years?
-
Now 5-9 since Mitchell was lost.
-
It'd be foolish for the Packers to not pick up his 5th year option. I'd think the hold up is trying to extend Love now and he's witnessing what Jackson got and well. Love knows where he stands in terms of talent, the practices, maybe what Rodgers passed on to him where he thinks he at in the league. The outside view is he's not proven to be a top tier or tier 2 QB thus far. So outside people would think like Reilly 20/20/25x3 should be good enough for Love to take. But Love shows out this year his numbers are upper 30s since that is what the rate is. Daniel Jones has 40mil per the next 4 years. Love is sitting in the catbird seat because he's got 20mil easy coming to him on that 5th year option. All it takes for him is to look really good for 1 of the next two seasons to see twice that or more come 2026. It's just a dream to believe Love would sign an extension that at first glance you'd think that team friendly if. Any extension he gets the first glance has to look like whoa, whoa, whoa that's way too much! It's their fault really to be in this situation because A. you didn't have to draft him in 2020. B. you didn't have to extend Rodgers to the seasons where you're stuck making the 5th year option decision on Love or extending him. C. You also let Rodgers get the win believing he could pull out 5 consecutive wins, vs benching him with 5 games to play and giving Love a real shot to prove himself on not only the 5th year option but a price point for an extension.
-
I'm not too high on Brooks. He's clearly slow and non agile. Bowling Green's conference is basically filled with 1 good team and the rest fighting for 4-6wins on the season. I went back through last 2 seasons of box scores and vs the 4 teams with significance outside the conference faced. UCLA had 0 tackles, 1 PD. Mississippi St. 1 solo tackle 1 PD. And the bowl game vs New Mexico St. 0 Tackles. 1 PD. In 2022. Against the 7-6 2021 Tennessee Vols he did have 5 total tackles with 1 for loss. Minnesota 1 tackle a sack. So against 5 teams outside his conference 5G 7 Tackles 2TFL. 1 sack. Highest rank teams were MS St at 20 and UCLA at 21. I'd be very surprised if the NFL talent facing doesn't keep him from having any impact.
-
You're probably right since I use wifi. I just wouldn't mind it split it half on 2 posts with the scrolling space to move to the next post.
-
Any chance when you post videos to limit it to 2 or 3 max? Really bogs down trying to load. Sat for over 1min waiting for this comment to load.
-
In regards to the Pirates their pitching isn't tearing it up for to deserve their record. Runs not allowed sure, but Fip? It's just like you knew the Brewers bullpen couldn't hold up with that start. Certainly happy the Pirates are distancing themselves from Stl. Cubs I'm just meh. I don't think they have the firepower to build up as the season goes.
-
More TE video watching. I'm feeling Mayer will be a bust. A guy who suffers an injury and loses what he barely has going for him. Washington has Finley vibes on the field only meaner and bigger blocking. He's a steal. Musgrave really gives me the Jordy Nelson vibes if Nelson were a TE size and build. Biggest rec threat ability. As I mentioned LaPorta is just the mix of Washington/Musgrave. Fall back option if the two are gone when we pick but 40s is high. Mod 50s fits right to even 60s. I'd rather take Mausch before him.
-
Great finds. He destroyed both Skoronski and Johnson. Huge factor is the weight gain building up and into his position. He's not finished and will be a big problem for defenses. Just quick TE tapes, there is 4 available with 2nd rd potential when you add Sam LaPorta. Mayer doesn't look fluid the way he runs. Didnt pop out to me. Musgrave looks much quicker but a little small so rec would be amazing but blocking iffy. Washington absolutely moves like Lewis only 2 steps quicker and maybe smidge meaner. LaPorta was like a mix of both Musgrave and Washington. Bears and Lions have 5 picks in the 2nd but only 1 before GB's 2 picks. (Bears have #1 in 3rd) I'd expect 1 or both to try jumping ahead of us. T Cody Mausch reads and looks like what the Packers want for an OL. I could see GB trading down 45 if Branch and other ideal targets were gone, with 1 TE selected at 42.
-
Or if they are in need to shed some cap money Baltimore maybe offers to take Bahkt and his salary of our hands? you know plus a couple picks from them.
-
So true on the early 2nds. You go back and see the values from like the top 10-15 picked in 2nd round, they seem to hit more than the majority of values of bottom 10 in 1st round. That overnight plus 1st rd drops very good decisions being made.
-
Thanks really forgot that move. Really just forgot he'd been around that long.
-
It's either the 3rd or other 2nd. It'd be every pick after the 3rd rd and a future 5th rd pick just to get in to the 30 selection.
-
Has Gutekunst traded down once in a live draft? Don't think he knows how to make it happen. Savage, Love, Watson only trading up. He's definitely trading up tonight. It'll either be in to top 10, or the 20s. I'm hoping it's the 20s version because the potential cost moving inside the top 10 would leave the team with their 6&7ths and 2? Picks above 6th rd. I still can't see why they would use the 1st on JSN after drafting Watson, but then again he failed to supply Rodgers with top WRs so now he'll feed Love the top WRs and ignore the more glaring need for a DE and TE or OL protection. I just think they could draft a WR later having Watson as a #1 Doubs #2. Slot guys as JSN is talked about as, are the type who fall in to 2nd-5th rds. Went over to WalterFootball. Lucas Van Ness is in the draft after redshirt sophomore year. Has the measurables while being a year younger has the sound of a 1st rd pick you extend and have for the prime age seasons. Myles Murphy also sounds like the duo fit pass rusher/ run defense they need badly. We're going to be a team giving 4-6secs for QBs to tear apart the defense again if we don't get help with pass rush.
-
Could who they brought in be an effect the belief Skoronski is picked well before 15, now 13? How was Jenkins talked about pre-draft? Wouldn't Pro-Bowler at guard who can kick out to average Tackle be a good fit with the OL makeup right now? I imagine guard is quicker to get going over a tackle? So he gets seasoning in game experience while grasping the Tackle position as time goes?
-
Just isn't a reason to draft a WR with 13th pick after trading up and getting Watson in 2nd last season. I'm looking for Edge or OL with 13. Skoronski or Paris Johnson. I wonder on this draft if 1 of the 2 fall down to 13 you the one who did. Otherwise the writeups on Edges seem to have mix on being an edge or adding weight to be a DT. The defensive fronts we run, the hybrid version sounds like a winning add to me either way. Our secondary may produce more turnovers with a QB more under duress or having better 3down distance to go situations stopping the run. Of course there's the dire need on a TE. I keep seeing Kincaid in that 9-13 range. Doesn't read to me like he or a bunch of these 1st rd/early 2nd TEs really belong there. Just seems to show how weak the draft class is by projecting them that high. Maybe I'm missing something with Kincaid being that high but if he's around when 13 comes and GB selects him, hope he turns out to value there. We need one. I've hated the last decade of TEs with 0 downfield threat. 0 Red zone threat. Just always felt Rodgers found TEs on defensive breakdowns coving them. It wasn't that they beat a guy 1-on-1.
-
I don't think they would use both 2nds. I think Patrick is same when agreeing from my suggestion that 1 of the 2nds would be used to trade back in to 1st. Both 2nds would technically get to 17-20. So would that be a tier of players better than 20-50 and worthwhile?
-
Going to guess GB trades up back in to 1st rd with either Cincy or NO to select the best remaining TE that falls there using 1 of the 2nds and the 3 rd. pick.
-
Well what's your definition as high? 3rd rd sounds good to me so expectations would be it turns in to an awful player because 3rd. I'd think they find a way to sign/trade for a vet vs spending a pick on a guy this season. I'd hope Love is focused on his 1st season starting versus being dragged in to some teaching already himself. I'd also want a vet that could be a mentor as Love goes through his in game experiences to talk to.
-
Finally the saga is done. Draft value gained is about #33/34. So the 1st pick in 2nd rd. Kinda lame we had to throw in the 5th but maybe that changed the 2024 narrative if Rodgers didn't play that season GB should return some kind of 2025 pick. 65pct of the plays I assume is offensive snaps? Or plays that a QB is used. Seems easier than the condition of division winning or making the playoffs to get the 1st in 24. He could miss 4-5games now that are losses that improve that 1st rd pick. And obviously if he doesn't play 65pct, that 2nd is going to be higher.
-
Before we get on a Pirates scary team wheel let's remember 10 games pitched and batted against have been Cincy and Colorado. Expected bottom feeders in each division. Kudos to them doing what they should and beat those 2 handedly.
-
Then the Jets select that player at 13. I suggested if there was different players targeted on each other's board. A quick draft need search has the Jets needing a OL, C, QB, and safety. GB- S, TE, Edge. WR Among what I'm seeing for top 50 draft player rankings. Brian Branch is the 1 and only safety in it. I will say looking at the draft and GB needs, a lot of what they need sits from 15-24 with TE and Edge, and WR The Jets needs aside from Skoronski or Branch aren't really there at their pick. Very much see my idea on them looking for them to trade down and then offer that selection to GB for Rodgers. They ought to be able to pair 1 of their 2nd rd choices with the pick they received besides the 1st to move back in the 1st rd if needed. I see a Minnesota Center fitting their need who is around 25-40 as your trade back to 1st rd 5 year control. Anyways. Spending way too much time expanding on this idea.
-
? Let's say? the Jets board. So what I'm going on is that GB and the Jets are constantly on the phone discussing where their draft boards are sitting in regard to who they would select at 13 or 15. While the draft is on going. If the 2 sides honestly have a deal hashed out but with their picks close to one another moving up/down 2 spots in first or up/down 3 spots in 2nd. They could have what compensations are of including a swap in 1st or swapping the 2nd with the other 2nd included. Maybe that ties in to where 2024 round future pick ends up being. We're down to 5 days from now from draft without the trade announced, so I wonder if this is waiting out how draft falls to both sides when to pull the trigger then vs now.
-
I'm sure there are phone calls already put out for feelers. Maybe a last idea is if Jets trade down the slot in 1st rd becomes something they would trade that 1st to Green Bay.
