Exactly, not to mention the financial incentives being highly stacked in favor of pre-arbitration value.
That said, there was some benefit to the Melvin “all in” approach because we got some highly memorable seasons out of it, while our more conservative approach to consistent winning is yielding mostly pain in the first round of the playoffs. The biggest question in my head is how much of that is bad luck vs. how much is it caused by running guys out there with minimal experience into high leverage postseason games?