Awesome take by JV.
I'll give an optimistic take -- for as long as I can remember it's been near impossible to get any reform in MLB despite the rapid changes that everyone has experienced. Both the league itself and its fans have leaned toward the "traditionalist" take of letting the game evolve without intervention and the result of that was that the product on the field changed into something that people didn't really like and it wasn't until that evolution had swung completely out of whack that anything was done about it. And even so, the changes that went into effect in 2023 were highly controversial prior to implementation although it only took maybe a week or two into the season until they were widely lauded. Theo Epstein deserves a ton of credit for that -- the changes that did get implemented prior to Theo coming on board were done poorly (e.g. replay/challenges) and nobody trusts Manfred or MLBPA to act in the broader interest of the game. Plus, some new rules like the "Manfred runner" remain unpopular.
So it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone that the 2023 rule changes are only step one of what is probably going to be a half dozen major rule updates that are needed to correct the game, not to mention additional ones to correct problems that we can't even conceive of yet.
The reason I'm optimistic is that I think the "traditionalist" mindset of baseball fans still largely dominates, but instead of advocating for things to be left alone, the majority of media and fans are pushing for rule changes. Nobody likes a parade of relief pitchers and everyone is pushing for starting pitching to return to prominence -- but as Verlander noted it's going to take a long time to unwind the current state of the game.
Interestingly, it seems the one area where traditionalist beliefs go away is an acceptance of technology. Once we had Pitch F/X and especially Umpire Scorecards, it was inevitable that people would eventually start clamoring for ABS.