I'll take someone playing "over their head" verse someone that couldnt hit the broad side of a barn. But there is no reason to believe Roberts will continue to hit over his head. Why can't we understand the Weeks was playing over his head as well last year. Because he's a Brewers doesn't mean he'll pan out, or that they never play over their head. I'm a stats guy, no secret, but I'm listening to the scouts here. When they tell me a guy with great minor league stats has the potential to hit even better in the bigs, why can't I trust them a little bit. They know a heck of a lot more than I do about a baseball swing. I'll take Brian Roberts over the fact he HAS hit well unlike Weeks who hasn't and may never. Again, this is where we only see the word potential being used. Well, its risk verse reward. You want the guy that you know will be a little above average for you, or do you want the guy who could be even more than that, but might never be more than average? This risk/reward, salary, age, even things like team chemistry (best friends with Fielder) all accounted for, I'm fine with sticking by Weeks for longer than 3 months post-surgery. Another thing I want to point out is Weeks injury. We might never know if he'll ever be fully recovered. So a healthy Roberts who can actually hit is always a better option over an unhealthy Weeks. I too think Weeks' star has fallen a notch. Even then, he still have the "potential" according to both scouts and stats to be much better than Roberts. Again, its risk verse reward.