I mean, I guess it would be kinda like that. Except Lauer has owned the Dodgers over 7 starts and Woodruff has 1 AB vs Kershaw. I know you're being facetious, but Woodruff and Gamel aren't that different as hitters anyway. I get your point of view on Lauer, but there's little to lose here as it might be a bullpen game anyway. I'm not married to the idea at all, but I would definitely understand it if CC actually did it (which I don't think he will). But we have the series to lose. Yes the Dodgers are better. Yes the Brewers are more likely to do something silly and give the Dodgers the series. But just as the Brewers are a clunker away from facing Kershaw in an elimination game ... the Dodgers are also a clunker away from facing Brandon Woodruff in an elimination game. I'm not ok with 'YOLO!' being our team motto for the series until it has to be. Just my opinion. It's not YOLO though. He has been very good against them his whole career. I know he's sucked this year, but there is some theory behind the move. When I say "there's nothing to lose" I mean more in a sense of this particular game, not the series. If, and it's an if, this is going to be a bullpen game, I can definitely see Lauer over Suter. I think that's a defensible position. And I very much agree that the Dodgers are a clunker away from facing Woodruff in an elimination game, which is why I would take the risk of stealing game 1 with a guy who has pitched very well against them. I get your stance completely, but I think I might roll the dice.