Clearly, no one actually can see into the future. If you cant tell that all I am doing is predicting that he will never stop being a free swinger in the same way that you are predicting he will stop being one then I don't know what to say. His age doesnt really matter, what matters is his 1700+ PAs with a 5% walk rate. How many examples can you find of players like this who then upped their walk rate to 8-9% for the rest of their career? You think he has improved, I think he is just having a hot streak. He has improved slightly in his 2 weeks worth of PAs this season, swinging at 8% fewer pitches outside of the zone with an 8% higher overall contact rate. However, he also has seen about5% more fastballs this season and 6% fewer curveballs compared to his career average. His walk rate is very important, if he never takes his walks he will never get enough hittable pitches to keep up his current pace. Another small but simple example of what I've been harping on. 1st pitch slider on the black that he can't do anything with. He lays off. Next pitch is a fastball he can do something with and drills it into center. You see, some people honestly think this game doen't even require watching, only reading box scores and then using advanced metrics to make definitive statements on what a player is or isn't. What I'm saying, is if you actually WATCH the guy play, screw the numbers, he's coming up to the plate and approaching his at bats differently. Not a hot streak as he wasn't "hot," before he went on the DL. And I know it's mind bending for someone to actually WATCH a player(I refer to Estrada last year when his velocity jumped and everyone said he was a fluke for about 2 months). No, he was a different player. Numbers are HUGE when trying to decide what player to sign, to predict what a player is going to do over the course of a season, etc..etc..but talent has been found in this game for 130 years without them. Watching a player's a lot more important than being able to rattle off why he won't keep it up because he hasn't in the past. And he VERY well may not keep it up. I'm just saying if he continues to have at bats like he has, which hasn't got a thing to do with him being "hot," and I'm sorry if I haven't articulated clearly enough yet that's not what I'm talking about, but I don't know how else to make it clearer, then he's going to be a much more effective big league hitter. I think part of the reason people are "talking down" to you isn't that they aren't watching the games, its that we have seen Gomez get his head right before and fix his approach, then go back to being himself a few weeks later. And BTW, its talking down to other posters when you assume they are just reading box scores and looking at metrics just because they disagree with you.