Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
Verified Member
Posted

I'm just not a fan of resting so many regular starters on the same day... 

Yelich, big deal, he just needs to start less in general.

Contreras needs a day here and there, I get that, but maybe not on a day that so many others are relegated to the bench.

Bauers is banged up.  Makes sense.

Mitchell neck issue.  Makes sense.

Pratt with a random day of rest.  Same with Contreras, rest him on a day when there aren't so many others resting.

I guess it isn't so much resting as just getting some guys healthier, but damn it, I want that top seed wrapped up and under the tree before we go into full on rest mode.

 

  • Like 1
"I'm sick of runnin' from these wimps!" Ajax - The WARRIORS
Posted

I don’t see how you can leave Stallings off the playoff roster. Who are you going to trust more to come into a game whenever and give you 9 outs when things go wrong and you don’t want to burn your power arms? 

  • Like 4
Posted

Stallings may not have the talent or pedigree of many Brewers prospects, but so far in 2026, he knows how to get outs at the major league level. That should count for something. He’s looked better than the trade deadline relievers. 

  • Like 1
Community Moderator
Posted
Just now, adambr2 said:

I don’t see how you can leave Stallings off the playoff roster. Who are you going to trust more to come into a game whenever and give you 9 outs when things go wrong and you don’t want to burn your power arms? 

It's awesome that we have like three other arms in the bullpen that we can stretch to 2-3 innings in close games. We haven't even needed to use Senzatela in that type of situation despite him being fully capable of it. 
 

1 minute ago, edfunderburk said:

Stallings may not have the talent or pedigree of many Brewers prospects, but so far in 2026, he knows how to get outs at the major league level. That should count for something. He’s looked better than the trade deadline relievers. 

The asterisk is that it's been all low leverage. But in terms of his performance within the role he's been given, he's aced the test. 
 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, owbc said:


The asterisk is that it's been all low leverage. But in terms of his performance within the role he's been given, he's aced the test. 
 

Agreed … but wouldn’t you say the recent outings by Harrison & Sproat were low leverage outings where they repeatedly failed miserably?

Community Moderator
Posted
1 minute ago, edfunderburk said:

Agreed … but wouldn’t you say the recent outings by Harrison & Sproat were low leverage outings where they repeatedly failed miserably?

I think we're in alignment that Stallings has outperformed those two. I was more comparing him to the deadline relievers that are getting steady high leverage work. 

Meanwhile...not quite a punt game yet! 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, RobertCrawley said:

Run by run.

Speaking of runs … we’re running out of innings to play catch up. 

This was a very winnable game until the decision was made to bump May & start Harrison. Disappointing. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, edfunderburk said:

We could have won today if we had started Stallings instead of Harrison. Disappointing. 

I'm disappointed too.  Not because they lost, but because they effectively lost Harrison.  Nobody else on our roster besides Miz and Henderson have the upside that Harrison has to matchup with the Dodgers starting pitching.  And i don't think Miz and Henderson will be enough.

I hope I'm wrong, but without Harrison this post season feels like it will be "same old same old"

Posted
4 minutes ago, edfunderburk said:

Agreed … but wouldn’t you say the recent outings by Harrison & Sproat were low leverage outings where they repeatedly failed miserably?

Question is ... would we trust Stallings to face the Dodgers in the NLCS?

 

Just now, edfunderburk said:

Speaking of runs … we’re running out of innings to play catch up. 

This was a very winnable game until the decision was made to bump May & start Harrison. Disappointing. 

Umm ... it's still a very winnable game.

Posted
2 minutes ago, edfunderburk said:

Speaking of runs … we’re running out of innings to play catch up. 

This was a very winnable game until the decision was made to bump May & start Harrison. Disappointing. 

Hindsight is 20-20

Actually, a lot of people don't see the past very clearly.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

  • Like 1
  • WHOA SOLVDD 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Ron Robinsons Beard said:

Question is ... would we trust Stallings to face the Dodgers in the NLCS?

 

Umm ... it's still a very winnable game.

Trust him more as opposed to what other options? Is he one of the top 12-13 options is the only question in my mind. 

  • Like 1
Verified Member
Posted
4 minutes ago, thammondwis said:

I'm disappointed too.  Not because they lost, but because they effectively lost Harrison.  Nobody else on our roster besides Miz and Henderson have the upside that Harrison has to matchup with the Dodgers starting pitching.  And i don't think Miz and Henderson will be enough.

I hope I'm wrong, but without Harrison this post season feels like it will be "same old same old"

buzzkill

  • Like 1
"I'm sick of runnin' from these wimps!" Ajax - The WARRIORS
Community Moderator
Posted
Just now, edfunderburk said:

If only Harrison had not started … Brewers would be in the lead!

Moving the goalposts much?

  • WHOA SOLVDD 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...