Yes, that would be the definition of collusion. And how does having one of the league's most marketable stars sitting on the sidelines because of a "wink, nod" agreement benefit the game? I get the argument that the players are making a lot of money, but should the players make peanuts while owners rake in millions upon millions in revenue every year, while justifying raising the costs of tickets, concessions and merchandise by blaming rising player salaries? There's a thread on this in the Major Leagues section of the forum, so I'll just say this one thing... The players signed/extended the CBA right as market valuations of older free agents began to change. So while it hurts, they signed up for/are stuck with a few more years of this. The best thing for players to do would be fight for the fans. Tell their owners that if they are going to keep down salaries, then they should also keep down prices for the fans. That would plausibly give the players public opinion leverage when the next CBA comes up. If I'm Darvish, I'm probably waiting until the fifth day of spring training or until one of the other big three signs. He has no good reason to give an owner a bargain unless some other force makes it look like he's going to lose money. As much as I want the market to start moving, it's really not Yu's fault that the market is stuck. He just happens to be the clear cream of the crop in a year with few suitors.