Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Randy Wolf- Latest: Multiple sources say done deal with Brewers


yoshii8
  • Replies 211
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
You really have to wonder why the Dodgers didn't offer Wolf arbitration. The odds on him accepting after that type of year must have been quite low. Perhaps they were concerned his arb-hearing could give him a 12-15 million dollar paycheck, based on that ERA?
Their owner is going through a divorce. They may not have the money to pay him.
Posted

No problem, just making sure everyone is clear. http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/smile.gif

 

Coupled with the earlier report about Wolf's signing being close, you'd think we'd see some movement on Wolf tonight or tomorrow.

Posted

Link

 

TH's latest, thinks that it would take that 3rd year for the Brewers to get Wolf.

 

From the link:

 

"Wouldn't surprise me if it's in the neighborhood of $25 million over three years. Like I said, the Brewers will have to pay top dollar to get Wolf to come to Milwaukee."

 

EDIT: Beat me to it trwi7.
Posted
Funketown wrote:
A rotation of Gallardo, Wolf, Parra, Bush, Suppan really doesn't sound too bad, all things considered.
If DM can get Wolf 10 mil-ish, that would give us enough money to sign bedard/sheets to a one year deal. Or he may choose to get a low risk low reward pitcher davis/ garland.

 

With our offense/defense combined with an improved rotation leads my biased opinion to think the brewers will win the central (cardinals minus holliday)

 

Gallardo, wolf, _______, Bush, Parra. SP6/ long relief: Suppan (also Cappy & Mulder)

Posted
I'm not a fan of going more than 2 years on a pitcher like Wolf, but if it's in the range of 3 years for $25mil, it's certainly a manageable risk for the Brewers. I thought he would get more since teams don't have to give up picks.
Posted
The Brewers could backload the deal - $5/10/10 million or something like that - in order to soften this year's blow before we are rid of Suppan's contract. Then, if Wolf bombs, we can continue to have an albatross contract for a couple of more years.
Posted
Is there anyone else out there that dislikes this as much as I do? I realize the options are limited, but why should I get excited about a 33-year old who just happens to have the far and away best season of his career year before entering free agency? Then give the guy 3 years with 8-9 mil per? Sorry, I'm not buying it.
Posted
Certainly looks like this could happen tonight yet....

It sure does :>)

Robin Yount - “But what I'd really like to tell you is I never dreamed of being in the Hall of Fame. Standing here with all these great players was beyond any of my dreams.”
Posted
Is there anyone else out there that dislikes this as much as I do? I realize the options are limited, but why should I get excited about a 33-year old who just happens to have the far and away best season of his career year before entering free agency? Then give the guy 3 years with 8-9 mil per? Sorry, I'm not buying it.
Yeah, it's hard to swallow the price. But what are the options? You can get a Looper-type guy for $5 million. Or maybe a Jon Garland type for $7 million or so. None of these guys are particularly appealing - especially at the price. You can take some flyers on injured or older guys - Smoltz, etc. But that's a big risk. Or go with some young guys - but what young guys? Perhaps we could make a trade or two, but people don't tend to give up young pitching easily. And we'd have to offer something back.

 

Wolf had a very good 2009. Certainly expect some regression, but hopefully, he could keep his ERA sub-4.00 and be a solid #3 type guy.

Posted
I'm officially torn on this, it's all going to depend on the contract duration/money. I think that he can be solid, but I'm not sure if he is #2 starter material. He is a better option than Washburn or Davis, but his age and the fact that he is coming off of arguably his career season make me a little nervous.
Posted
I agree, but the team can't stand pat. We just don't have the luxury of doing that without throwing in the towel on 2010. And if it is 3/25, you have to figure that 8m per year doesn't get much on the FA pitching market.
Posted

Wolf has always had talent not a nibbler by any means. When he has been healthy he has been pretty good. Hopefully he'll be like Al Lieter & not Jeff Suppan. Now if they can land a decent high reward guy Smoltz/Bedard/Duchscherer

Posted
Is there anyone else out there that dislikes this as much as I do? I realize the options are limited, but why should I get excited about a 33-year old who just happens to have the far and away best season of his career year before entering free agency? Then give the guy 3 years with 8-9 mil per? Sorry, I'm not buying it.
Yep, I'm no fan of giving Randy Wolf ~3/25. I'd hate to have Suppan come off the books next year just to be saddled with another bad contract for two more years. If Randy Wolf is our only option, I almost think we're better off standing pat.
Posted
I was never overwhelmed by Randy Wolf but he is probably the best we are going to do free agent wise. I hope this isn't where Melvin stops, though, as I would love to see one more option, preferably on a one year deal. Money wise, this isn't the killer the Suppan is. We dumped a lot in salary this offseason and will do so again next offseason with Riske, Hall, Suppan, and possibly Hoffman and Fielder coming off the books as well. Overall, I won't be standing in line to get my playoff tickets quite yet but its certianly a good start.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...