Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Brewers in front with Nationals for Carl Pavano?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 270
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
If he ends up being the 3rd or 4th starter, that wouldn't be too shabby. I'd rather have him as 4th starter and trade for someone else to be the 3rd starter.

4th starter? He sure as heck isn't going to get paid like one. He was the #2 on an AL playoff team last year. In a perfect world the Brewers would acquire an ace to go with Yo and you could slot 3 thru 5 as Pavano, Wolf, Narveson. But the more likely case if they sign Pavano is that he's the #2. Which isn't that bad since he did it in the tougher league.

Posted
He has a career 4.34 ERA, most of it in the AL, but has been very up and down. I love the fact he does not walk hardly anyone, and is successful despite pitching to contact. He'll get at least 3 years, and maybe 4, as limited as the market is.
Posted
I would hope Melvin has learned his lesson about signing veteran free agent pitchers.

You'd think so, wouldn't you? When I saw this rumor yesterday I just shook my head.

Stearns Brewing Co.: Sustainability from farm to plate
Posted

The problem is that there are no assurances, but IF (and that's a big "if") Pavano could get the results in 2011 that he did in '10, he'd represent a significant rotation upgrade over Bush & Parra.

 

I still think I'd rather have Vazquez, but you could do a whole lot worse than Pavano.

 

(edited for omitted word)

Posted
The problem is that there are no assurances, but IF (and that's a "if") Pavano could get the results in 2011 that he did in '10, he'd represent a significant rotation upgrade over Bush & Parra.
I agree - the problem is that he's going to get at least a 2-year deal, so he'd need to repeat those results for a few years in a row. I'm less optimistic about that.
Posted
I to would not mind getting him. But I would not give him more than 3 years and I would prefer only 2. But I doubt that he takes a 2 year deal. Like Toby said, if he is not the best pitcher we get, it would not be too bad to get Pavano.

Formerly BrewCrewIn2004

Posted
I guess if you give him Wolf's contract and between the two of them, one pitches like a three and one pitches like a five at least for the duration of their deals, I can handle this move. I agree that we'd still need to obtain somebody at Yo's level somehow.
Posted

The problem is that there are no assurances, but IF (and that's a "if") Pavano could get the results in 2011 that he did in '10, he'd represent a significant rotation upgrade over Bush & Parra.
I agree - the problem is that he's going to get at least a 2-year deal, so he'd need to repeat those results for a few years in a row. I'm less optimistic about that.
FWIW, once he was traded to the Twins in '09, Pavano also pitched increasingly better as the season went on. I only mention that because his positive trend is more of a one-plus seasons thing, not only purely last season.
Posted
I would really like this if they sign him, especially if they do it sooner rather then later. That way it allows Melvin to worry about trades and other matters.
Posted
I've got very mixed feelings about this. I think Pavano might end up being a better signing than Wolf, but still another signing like this isn't something we need right now. I'd rather pick up a younger starter with some upside, or go after a guy that comes cheap with little to no risk.
Feel free to follow me on twitter https://twitter.com/#!/ItsFunkeFresh
Posted
I've got very mixed feelings about this.

I don't. This smells like a Suppan deal to me. He's fine as a 4 or 5 (at a lot less money and fewer years than he'll actually command), but if you're hoping for more than that then I fear you'll be disappointed

Posted

This smells like a Suppan deal to me.

 

i'm starting to think the same thing. another "he's ok" starter that pitches like a #5 but we pay as if he was a #3. it's not just Suppan, but Looper, Doug Davis and first-half Randy Wolf. i guess i wouldn't mind Pavano on a two-year deal, but there will be enough teams after him that we won't be getting any bargain. i think i'd rather take my chances with both Jeffress and Rogers in the rotation even if one fails than a much more expensive Pavano, who it doesn't seem like will really out-produce either of them. i'm just not sure paying mid-level money for a mid-level rotation is the way to go, and maybe it might work best with a high-end 1 and 2, and a cheap-but-riskier back end. unless we give away the farm to get Greinke, i'm not sure Pavano in the rotation necessarily gives us an upgrade for the financial and injury risk that we'd be taking on.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...