Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
Posted
Just now, Brewcrew82 said:

I didn't see much of a hop. You gotta keep that ball in front of you. 

It definitely hopped up not sure what you were watching as it was in front of him.  If it wasn't it wouldn't have hit him in the chest.

Posted
1 minute ago, nate82 said:

That was definitely a bad hop.  The ball was looking like it was going to be down and then hopped up and hit him in the chest.  If that isn't a bad hop then I don't know what would qualify as such.

That hop came right as the baserunner going to 2nd ran by him...Turang would say he needs to make that play, but it definitely wasn't a can of corn

  • Like 3
Posted

The Kevin Brown situation makes me wonder how much some of these announcers are told to be as positive as possible. To listen to the Brewers TV crew the Brewers have the most rotten luck in the world with line drives turning into outs, opponents’ bleeders going for hits, ball-strike calls, opponents making plays they usually don’t make, and now bad hops. 
 

ETA: Latest example from Schroeder: “Seems like every time the Brewers make a mistake it costs them big.”  Maybe they’re making too many mistakes. 

  • Like 1
Note: If I raise something as a POSSIBILITY that does not mean that I EXPECT it to happen.
Posted
4 minutes ago, BruisedCrew said:

The Kevin Brown situation makes me wonder how much some of these announcers are told to be as positive as possible. To listen to the Brewers TV crew the Brewers have the most rotten luck in the world with line drives turning into outs, opponents’ bleeders going for hits, ball-strike calls, opponents making plays they usually don’t make, and now bad hops. 

ETA: Latest example from Schroeder: “Seems like every time the Brewers make a mistake it costs them big.”  Maybe they’re making too many mistakes. 

I'm sure there is an understanding that they can't bash the on-field product too harshly but also, they're professionals. Sitting through 162 being negative would both be exhausting and alienate viewers. This is an entertainment product they're selling, after all.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

I'm sure there is an understanding that they can't bash the on-field product too harshly but also, they're professionals. Sitting through 162 being negative would both be exhausting and alienate viewers. This is an entertainment product they're selling, after all.

I’m making a distinction between being negative and going out of your way to make excuses. 

  • Like 1
  • WHOA SOLVDD 1
Note: If I raise something as a POSSIBILITY that does not mean that I EXPECT it to happen.
Posted

Welcome to the latest episode of “heated duels with awful teams”

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • WHOA SOLVDD 1
"Did I ever tell you how I became a Postman Abby? I don't know if you'd laugh or cry"-The Postman
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, BruisedCrew said:

The Kevin Brown situation makes me wonder how much some of these announcers are told to be as positive as possible. To listen to the Brewers TV crew the Brewers have the most rotten luck in the world with line drives turning into outs, opponents’ bleeders going for hits, ball-strike calls, opponents making plays they usually don’t make, and now bad hops. 
 

ETA: Latest example from Schroeder: “Seems like every time the Brewers make a mistake it costs them big.”  Maybe they’re making too many mistakes. 

A few weeks ago I was listening to the Padres' radio b'cast. (They're good, BTW; I really like T. Gwynn, Jr.) and they were specifically talking about how much of a "homer" (or not) you have to be in order to be honest and popular.  The conclusion is that those 2 things are not necessarily in conflict:  You must be honest; you need not be mean. It was a very candid discussion. 

EDIT: the Kevin Brown deal was absolutely a disgrace for the Orioles. Their owner is probably a big fan of the current Russian dictator. He's at least an imitator.
 

Edited by Nola Beery
added more :poop:
  • Like 1
Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Posted
1 minute ago, Nola Beery said:

A few weeks ago I was listening to the Padres' radio b'cast. (They're good, BTW; I really like T. Gwynn, Jr.) and they were specifically talking about how much of a "homer" (or not) you have to be in order to be honest and popular.  The conclusion is that those 2 things are not necessarily in conflict:  You must be honest; you need not be mean. It was a very candid discussion. 
 

Unless you work for the Orioles, apparently. In that case, ignore your history. There is only the present.

Bruce Lee Meditation GIF

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, BruisedCrew said:

I didn’t realize the Rockies had a lockdown bullpen. 

The pitchers they're throwing at us do have a combined ERA below 3...

Posted

Another example of why you done see many bunts. 
 

Of course, it took super athlete Suter to flag down that one. 🙄

Note: If I raise something as a POSSIBILITY that does not mean that I EXPECT it to happen.
Posted
5 minutes ago, BruisedCrew said:

I’m making a distinction between being negative and going out of your way to make excuses. 

Dunno, I listen to a lot of broadcasts and they all kinda do the same things. It's the hometown nine, most broadcast teams tend to couch "negatives" with niceties.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...