Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
Posted
1 hour ago, Jim French Stepstool said:

I'm not sure exactly where they stand AFA available schollies are concerned. But the current climate allows for quite a bit of leeway. Carter Gilmore was originally a walkon & is now on scholarship. He could have it taken away if need be, and I'm 99% sure he'd stay on and pay for his next year. And from what I understand Chris Hodges pretty much knew he'd lose his ride if the kid (Reynolds) who was planning on coming here & then flipped to UWGB had actually enrolled. Isaac Lindsay may be in the same boat, I don't recall if he's on a ride this year or not.

A lot of this stuff is unsavory. But when you're dealing with the portal as currently constructed, and with a lot of kids looking for the best NIL deal year-to-year, it's not surprising. I think the new model is "If you want someone, go after them & the roster/scholarship thing will work itself out."

As of right now they have 13 on schollie plus Lindsey is on a NIL deal in lieu of scholarship.  That's probably what would happen with Gilmore.  They'll do that for an unsure situation (i.e., both have a player who might leave but they aren't sure if he will AND high mutual interest from a recruit/transfer but not sure what school that kid is going to choose), but not for a deliberate situation (i.e. just sending out offers looking to upgrade, i.e. "Creaning").  And they won't get to a point where they have to put several kids on NIL deals because of too many scholarship players, thus why I think they knew that someone (i.e. Gus) was leaving.

As homer mentioned, sounds like they knew as Gus wasn't traveling with them.  I don't know if he's transferring; he might just be leaving the team to focus on his health/life choices.  Chances are he's been on the bench for home games so as not to cause any distractions about why he isn't there.

Posted
2 minutes ago, AKCheesehead said:

They're letting JMU get away with anything they want right now.

They should have about 8 fouls

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, AKCheesehead said:

I love how they were just complementing the defense and showed the obvious foul on the replay.  This is ridiculous.

Followed by three more reaches on Storr 

Posted
1 minute ago, AKCheesehead said:

I love how they were just complementing the defense and showed the obvious foul on the replay.  This is ridiculous.

It is horrible and the main reason this game is hard to watch so far

Posted

Regardless what the refs are or are not doing the offense is being a bit lazy on some of these passes.  Offensively this team is not executing at all.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, nate82 said:

Regardless what the refs are or are not doing the offense is being a bit lazy on some of these passes.  Offensively this team is not executing at all.

Exactly right. They need to create space with movement and are not at all

Posted
6 minutes ago, nate82 said:

Regardless what the refs are or are not doing the offense is being a bit lazy on some of these passes.  Offensively this team is not executing at all.

The offense is a lazy offense.  It works when Crowl can get on the block and do something.  Unfortunately, Nebraska showed that when you double Crowl, he is going to turn the ball over -- 80% of the time.

Tyler Wahl can't hit a bunny.  This isn't anything new, either.

When they are playing five out and Storr tries to dribble, nobody knows what to do because the offense isn't designed for that.

Yes -- the referees are letting a lot of hand checking, etc. going on.  On the dribble handoff, the JMU player had his hand OVER THE SHOULDER of the Wisconsin offensive player.  No call... "Great Defense."

They need to set some off the ball screens.  Period.  The refs aren't going to call the physical play.  Heck, they screwed up the obvious call where the ball went off of the JMU player.

Bottom line -- Wisconsin needs to play better.  Period.

Posted

I really haven't followed the Badgers or college basketball but they looked absolutely trash that half. Didn't look like they had any answers either. They have Whal stationed at the top of the circle and he's zero threat to shoot a three. What use is that? They throw him the ball and now he needs to pass somewhere else. He doesn't penetrate, can't shoot, is that the only option they have? It solves nothing. There doesn't seem to be much rhyme or reason to their offense. It was a bad half so obviously they must be better than this normally but being unfamiliar with them they just look incompetent.

Posted

I credit JMU with some really active hands & feet on defense, and a lot of it is w/o fouling IMO. I said to someone the other day UW wins this if they continue what they've shown the last 5-6 games, and will struggle & might get knocked off if they somehow revert to February. I didn't expect that, but here we are. TOs, settling for threes almost as if we feel the need to get a shot off before losing it, then finally getting it right but missing 2 footers. Crowl has to get something done in the block. The turnover spigot has to be shut off in the 2nd half, which usually happens. Hepburn has to somehow reboot. Drives to the hoop are fine, but set up a curl move or a pass to the lane or baseline......something. Storr is just putting his head down & hoping people get out of his way. They aren't.

Defense has been good enough to win, IMO.

You have to hope for Wahls' sake he's playing more hurt than they're letting on, because he's really going out on an ugly note if he doesn't get more done.

Posted
5 minutes ago, SeaBass said:

I really haven't followed the Badgers or college basketball but they looked absolutely trash that half. Didn't look like they had any answers either. They have Whal stationed at the top of the circle and he's zero threat to shoot a three. What use is that? They throw him the ball and now he needs to pass somewhere else. He doesn't penetrate, can't shoot, is that the only option they have? It solves nothing. There doesn't seem to be much rhyme or reason to their offense. It was a bad half so obviously they must be better than this normally but being unfamiliar with them they just look incompetent.

You pretty much nailed it as far as the deficiencies on offense go. They need to play through the paint to be successful IMO. If they take care of the ball this half it would help too

Posted
1 minute ago, RedStickBrew said:

You pretty much nailed it as far as the deficiencies on offense go. They need to play through the paint to be successful IMO. If they take care of the ball this half it would help too

21 points off 13 turnovers. Wisconsin has 4 points off 5 turnovers.

They have been dominated in just about every other facet of the game too though.

  • Like 2
Posted

Did some strange reason Hepburn passed the ball to Wahl about 5 feet after crossing half court while he was about 4 feet away.

Made no sense.

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Posted

can't defend pick n roll

"Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power......He probably has a future as a backup infielder if he can stop rolling over to third base and shortstop." Keith Law, 2006

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...