That's the 50-day multi-million dollar question. I don't think that anybody reasonably believes that an athlete must disclose every medication he takes to MLB. In fact, he's under no obligation to disclose any medication he takes, except as such a medication may impact the JDA. So, how far does an athlete have to go in investigating medications that are legally prescribed to him for a legitimate medical reason? That's not a question that impacts only Ryan Braun. It seems to me that the JDA does not overrule a player's basic right to medical privacy. If the arbitration panel were to rule that the only way to know for sure that taking a medication will not put the player in violation of the JDA is to check first with MLB, without regard to whatever advice he is given by his personal physician and other medical advisors on the matter, they would be ruling, in effect, that a player must choose between his personal privacy concerns and his profession every single time he receives a prescription. Is that where we're willing to go to catch whatever percentage of guys it is that will be caught under the testing program? We don't even know that this is an issue in the case, but regardless of that fact it's a question worth considering.I think it is the players responsibility to have someone (himself? his agent? his lawyer? his doctor?) contact MLB before taking any medication to make sure it is not going to get him suspended. It is just too stupid not to do this. Honestly, Braun just risked 2 million bucks doing this, plus whatever it might cost him in endorsements.