Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Brewers acquire Trevor Rosenthal


Posted
11 hours ago, edfunderburk said:

It appears by the time Rosenthal arrives it will be too late to matter for this abysmal season

Maybe he will re-sign with Milwaukee & offer solid support for Williams along with Bush next year

Since he is in the minor leagues and hasn’t appeared in the majors this year, maybe he can still be traded. But yeah, this move is looking like it’s going to come up snake eyes. 

  • Replies 258
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
On 8/3/2022 at 9:51 AM, patrickgpe said:

he is not even in the giants top 30. lets not make this kid to be something he isn't. 

He's 21st in their system.

Posted

In the least surprising news possible, Rosenthal just left the Sounds game with the trainer. This after he was knocked around. A beyond senseless trade. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"88.6% of all statistics are made up right there on the spot" Todd Snider

 

-Posted by the fan formerly known as X ellence. David Stearns has brought me back..

Posted
27 minutes ago, Never Outhustled said:

In the least surprising news possible, Rosenthal just left the Sounds game with the trainer. This after he was knocked around. A beyond senseless trade. 

The trade deadline continues to impress 

Posted

I don' t really understand what the reward was here. Stearns already addressed the weak bullpen areas before acquiring him. Any thoughts that Rosenthal would make significant contributions to a playoff push were just dreams. If he was healthy and pitching important innings it most likely meant a lot of other guys were injured or failed. I'm sure whatever we gave up will ultimately be no loss but this seemed like a really pointless trade from the start.

Posted
4 minutes ago, jerichoholicninja said:

I don' t really understand what the reward was here. Stearns already addressed the weak bullpen areas before acquiring him. Any thoughts that Rosenthal would make significant contributions to a playoff push were just dreams. If he was healthy and pitching important innings it most likely meant a lot of other guys were injured or failed. I'm sure whatever we gave up will ultimately be no loss but this seemed like a really pointless trade from the start.

 

Agreed.

This move was really more appropriate for the Dodgers. They have money and prospects to burn and a need in the BP. They can afford to roll the dice and come up with nothing. The Brewers? Yeah, not so much.

Posted
13 hours ago, Axman59 said:

0.2 IP, 3 ER, 2 H (one HR), 2 BB, 1K

And now apparently injured.

?

Saw he was lit up and didnt even finish an inning in AAA. Didnt realize he was injured. 

W00f. Nice move by Stearns. 

Posted
2 hours ago, jerichoholicninja said:

I don' t really understand what the reward was here. Stearns already addressed the weak bullpen areas before acquiring him. Any thoughts that Rosenthal would make significant contributions to a playoff push were just dreams. If he was healthy and pitching important innings it most likely meant a lot of other guys were injured or failed. I'm sure whatever we gave up will ultimately be no loss but this seemed like a really pointless trade from the start.

Smart acquisition or not, the reasoning isn't hard to figure out: when healthy Rosenthal is electric: 364 innings, 490 strike outs 19(!) homers allowed.  His arm was actually healthy, this time he was laid up with a hamstring injury. 

It's a gamble that was probably worth taking and shows that Stearns likes his team's chances getting a guy who he knows will be out several weeks with a leg injury. As sometimes they do, it looks like this deal will come up snake eyes. 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Jopal78 said:

when healthy Rosenthal is electric:

 

The problem is that he's never healthy. Pretty much everyone saw this coming.

 

Posted
16 hours ago, Ron Robinsons Beard said:

This was always going to be a high risk/high reward type move. Looks like the risk is gonna outweigh the reward this time around.

No potential for high reward, the ceiling here was 10 innings. This deal was simply flushing money and a prospect down the drain.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"88.6% of all statistics are made up right there on the spot" Todd Snider

 

-Posted by the fan formerly known as X ellence. David Stearns has brought me back..

Posted
7 hours ago, Never Outhustled said:

No potential for high reward, the ceiling here was 10 innings. This deal was simply flushing money and a prospect down the drain.

Whatever amount of prorated salary they’re paying him certainly didn’t prevent them from making other moves so it’s irrelevant.

The minor league player if he even sees the majors will have beaten the odds. It was a salary dump for the Giants.

Posted
Just now, Jopal78 said:

Whatever amount of prorated salary they’re paying him certainly didn’t prevent them from making other moves so it’s irrelevant.

The minor league player if he even sees the majors will have beaten the odds. 

Better to save the money for a real move. Better to save the prospect for a real trade. 

I'm always told we'd have to empty the farm system to make a significant deal, but we give away guys for Daniel Norris, John Curtis, Rosentha...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"88.6% of all statistics are made up right there on the spot" Todd Snider

 

-Posted by the fan formerly known as X ellence. David Stearns has brought me back..

Posted
7 hours ago, Never Outhustled said:

No potential for high reward, the ceiling here was 10 innings. This deal was simply flushing money and a prospect down the drain.

I'm sorry, but that is a totally bogus argument. You don't acquire a guy like Rosenthal without the idea that he's going to pitch consequential innings in big playoff race games and playoff games themselves. And there's no way you can convince me that every one of those innings aren't important.

Your argument has all the appearances of piling on simply for the sake of piling on.

Posted
15 hours ago, Jopal78 said:

Smart acquisition or not, the reasoning isn't hard to figure out: when healthy Rosenthal is electric: 364 innings, 490 strike outs 19(!) homers allowed.  His arm was actually healthy, this time he was laid up with a hamstring injury. 

It's a gamble that was probably worth taking and shows that Stearns likes his team's chances getting a guy who he knows will be out several weeks with a leg injury. As sometimes they do, it looks like this deal will come up snake eyes. 

Spot on. It was a gamble. Sometimes those don't pay off. When they don't, you move on. Odd move for sure, but I get why they did it. They took a flyer on a guy who has been one of the top pen arms in the majors for a big stretch of time. A guy who has succeeded in plenty of big, consequential games. Yes, he's old. And yes, he's been injured. That's why they were able to grab him for basically an inconsequential prospect. Who knows ... maybe Peters will turn into a major league OFer. But I'll tell you what, his ceiling is never going to be higher than Frelick's, Mitchell's, Weimer's, Ruiz's, or even Lutz's. That's why he was expendable in a deal like this.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ron Robinsons Beard said:

Yes, he's old.

No, he isn't.  He turned 32 at the end of May.

 

8 hours ago, Never Outhustled said:

No potential for high reward, the ceiling here was 10 innings. This deal was simply flushing money and a prospect down the drain.

No, the ceiling was replicating the 2015 Royals who turned every game into a 5-inning game.  Get into the playoffs, shorten the rotation to Burnes/Woodruff/Peralta/Lauer, have them go twice through the order and then turn things over to Bush/Box/Rogers/Williams/Rosenthal.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Ron Robinsons Beard said:

I'm sorry, but that is a totally bogus argument. You don't acquire a guy like Rosenthal without the idea that he's going to pitch consequential innings in big playoff race games and playoff games themselves. And there's no way you can convince me that every one of those innings aren't important.

Your argument has all the appearances of piling on simply for the sake of piling on.

His last time in the post season Rosenthal have up 6 runs in 4 innings. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"88.6% of all statistics are made up right there on the spot" Todd Snider

 

-Posted by the fan formerly known as X ellence. David Stearns has brought me back..

Posted
Just now, Ron Robinsons Beard said:

Hindsight has a way of doing that

There were plenty of people who spoke out against this deal from the start. And besides that it's a great trait to admit when you're initial reaction (whether blind optimism or poor judgement) was wrong. The people who are critical when appropriate and complimentary when warranted are much more grounded in reality than the people who only speak negatively or the people like yourself who act like this organization is infallible. Have some balance.

Posted
1 minute ago, True Blue Brew Crew said:

There were plenty of people who spoke out against this deal from the start. And besides that it's a great trait to admit when you're initial reaction (whether blind optimism or poor judgement) was wrong. The people who are critical when appropriate and complimentary when warranted are much more grounded in reality than the people who only speak negatively or the people like yourself who act like this organization is infallible. Have some balance.

Would I have made the Rosenthal deal? No. But then I kinda thought he was already retired ?

As I mentioned above, it was an odd deal. Not a ton of risk, with a potential decently high reward. That's why I understand the logic behind why they made it, as I'm sure you do as well.

This organization is far from infallible. It sucks that they didn't shore up the offense at the trading deadline. It sucks that they are getting next to nothing right now from the return they got in the Hader deal. It sucks that they keep trotting Davis and Taylor out to CF every day when it's obvious that if they stand any chance of making the playoffs, they need a spark. This team is giving off all the appearances of simply playing out the string at this point. And that sucks ... because they may never have this level of starting pitching strength again. 

But they aren't buried yet. And this team has a history of getting hot in September. It's a wierd, flawed and decidedly often mediocre-looking roster. But they have enough talent to be taken seriously come October if things fall right and a little luck comes their way.

Posted

Rosenthal was injured when he was acquired, so it appears that the thought process when acquiring him was to get him on the roster by September so he could be on the playoff roster, where he could help the team in the most important games.

Unfortunately, it's looking like (A) he probably won't be healthy enough to add to the September roster, and (B) our playoff hopes are dwindling, so we might not have anyone playing in those important games.

"The most successful (people) know that performance over the long haul is what counts. If you can seize the day, great. But never forget that there are days yet to come."

 

~Bill Walsh

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...