Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
Posted
Just now, HarryDoyle said:

That pretty much clinches the Sunday lineup for tomorrow.

At least the worst we will have gone is 18-15 without Chourio and Vaughn and Quinn. I’ll take it.

  • Like 2
Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Posted
11 minutes ago, adambr2 said:

At least the worst we will have gone is 18-15 without Chourio and Vaughn and Quinn. I’ll take it.

I think we were 8-7 when Yelich went out.

  • Like 1
"Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power......He probably has a future as a backup infielder if he can stop rolling over to third base and shortstop." Keith Law, 2006
Posted
6 minutes ago, RobertCrawley said:

That trade worked out well. Drohan has some upside too.

15 years from now we may have a thread about the Devin Williams trade tree.

  • Like 1
Posted

Glad we kept the starter healthy for a change…or so we think.

Also, why Nationals are not challenging a couple of balls in 9th are pretty bad strategy…gotta use on anything close in 9th, especially when having 2 left and base runners needed.

Verified Member
Posted
1 hour ago, HarryDoyle said:

That pretty much clinches the Sunday lineup for tomorrow.

What's the difference these days?

"I'm sick of runnin' from these wimps!" Ajax - The WARRIORS
Posted
10 minutes ago, TURBO said:

What's the difference these days?

Five Sunday Games so far with 31 runs scored equals 6.2 R/G when they should be resting.

27 Other Six Days of the Week Games with 139 runs scored equals 5.1 R/G on secular days,

MoAr SuNdAy LiNeUpZ pLeAze

Posted

The Sunday lineups have been helped by Yelich and then Sanchez coming off the bench to hit 3 run HRs.

Note: If I raise something as a POSSIBILITY that does not mean that I EXPECT it to happen.
Posted

My ABS question is: will umpires now make more of an attempt to call the zone as it is electronically?

I actually think it's a fascinating question, mainly because "yes" isn't necessarily a good answer. I don't really want everyone sort of conforming to the same zone regardless of context (for example, I've already seen a few of those calls where the pitcher misses his spot by a foot-and-half, but the ball lands in the zone, and it gets called a strike, even though it wouldn't have been in previous years--I don't like that much). Of course, "no" isn't a good answer either. We definitely want umps to consider the input the ABS is giving them. It just shouldn't be as simple as "ABS called this a strike, and I didn't, and I was wrong."

The best outcome here is challenges as a useful check on umpires. I personally don't want hitters (or catchers) just saving challenges for late in the game just to challenge borderline leverage pitches. I think, obviously, your certainty level can go down as the game progresses, but if you're 90 percent sure a pitch is wrong in the second inning, you should probably challenge it. 

The worst outcome is everyone saving challenges until late, players challenging a bunch of borderline pitches, and ABS just becoming a late-game coin flip for pitches that can fairly be called balls OR strikes.

I will say that I'm way more into this system than I was at the beginning of the year. It's interesting, adds a strategic element, and mostly has seemed less intrusive as I've managed to get used to it. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...