Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Chris Carter designated for assignment


markedman5

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
A little surprised by this. Couldn't Chris just be resigned and moved during the season? I'm assuming the 2017 starter at first isn't in the 40-man as of today?
Posted
Kind of surprising, but maybe they figure they can find a cheaper option who will provide more balance offensively and defensively?
"I wish him the best. I hope he finds peace and happiness in his life and is able to enjoy his life. I wish him the best." - Ryan Braun on Kirk Gibson 6/17/14
Posted

They didn't sign Carter until January last year, so Stearns must have confidence that there will be another guy available before spring.

 

Carter is a fun player to watch, but he's still just a 1 win player. For $8+ million, at age 29, on a team that is still rebuilding, I can see why they would pass.

 

He's not going to be on this roster when they are ready to compete, so I guess it's fine to let him go.

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Posted
They didn't sign Carter until January last year, so Stearns must have confidence that there will be another guy available before spring.

 

Carter is a fun player to watch, but he's still just a 1 win player. For $8+ million, at age 29, on a team that is still rebuilding, I can see why they would pass.

 

He's not going to be on this roster when they are ready to compete, so I guess it's fine to let him go.

 

Then trade him, don't give him away.

 

Very bad decision by Stearns.

Posted
They didn't sign Carter until January last year, so Stearns must have confidence that there will be another guy available before spring.

 

Carter is a fun player to watch, but he's still just a 1 win player. For $8+ million, at age 29, on a team that is still rebuilding, I can see why they would pass.

 

He's not going to be on this roster when they are ready to compete, so I guess it's fine to let him go.

 

Then trade him, don't give him away.

 

Very bad decision by Stearns.

 

Why would a guy that 29 other teams deemed not worthy of a 1 year/$3M dollar offer a year ago with no trade compensation, and who was pretty much exactly the guy who everyone expected, be worth anything in trade compensation now, with an $8M dollar price tag attached?

Posted
They didn't sign Carter until January last year, so Stearns must have confidence that there will be another guy available before spring.

 

Carter is a fun player to watch, but he's still just a 1 win player. For $8+ million, at age 29, on a team that is still rebuilding, I can see why they would pass.

 

He's not going to be on this roster when they are ready to compete, so I guess it's fine to let him go.

 

Then trade him, don't give him away.

 

Very bad decision by Stearns.

 

How do you know someone would even trade for him? $8mil likely no one...don't forget they probably went around the league to gauge interest before non tendering him.

 

This was a no brainer to me. They can easily just resign him for less if they want.

Posted
Cant be upset. It was discussed here if this would happen. The money for a 1WAR 1b just wasnt worth it it appears. Remember Carter had to have this offense just to be 1WAR. MLBTR suggests 8.1mil but if it was higher? In a way, you can applaud the decision that Stearns will pass on overextending someone's pricetag in relation to performance. Look forward to the future in Stearns GM moves.
Posted

I'm okay with the move.

 

I like Carter, but I also see he's very limited, and let's face it, he's not a longterm part of this club. I'd rather take gambles - like we did with Villar and Broxton - and see if we can strike some gold. 2017 is the time for such experiments.

 

Carter is pretty much a known quantity. He will find a home - no problem - and on a team that fits his talents.

 

I wish the man success.

Posted
Wait. You guys are upset that a guy who is not that great defensively and whose only marketable ability is that when he makes contact (not all that often), he hits the ball far? He's replaceable by just about anyone. No need to be upset.
Posted
Reason they didn't do it sooner? Protect another rule 5 eligible player? That's my only question. Stearns doesn't want these Joey Meyer, Rob Deer, Mark aBrouhard type guys. Carter served the purpose cheaply for a year, obviously couldn't trade him at the deadline last season, move on.
Posted
Ryan Braun to 1B anyone? I had to say it before someone else did. Not that I'd mind, if he can play the position...
"I'm sick of runnin' from these wimps!" Ajax - The WARRIORS
Posted
I get it and I understand it but it's still disappointing they couldn't at least find somewhere to trade him. Also disappointing that our organizational ineptitude at first base will continue. Carter at least offered something unlike the string of crap we've ran out there since Hart blew out his knee.
Posted
Adam Lind is likely available. 1 yr at $4-5 million would get it done. Would need a RH platoon partner though. Perez?

 

Santana, Braun, or Cooper. Could probably get Jason Rogers back for a song.

Posted

With young OFs starting to come up during this year, it makes sense to move the defensively inept Santana to 1B.

 

Play Perez or someone in RF for a few weeks until Brinson can be brought up to play CF and move Broxton to RF

Posted

I have no issues with this move. Carter isn't worth 8M and nobody will trade for him at that price. We got good enough production from 2.5M and you move on now. I'm a fan of Cooper but don't think he's ready to start the year. Winter Meetings should be a blast for us.

 

Trade Braun and Thornburg to Dodgers and bring back Bellinger + bunch of other talent

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...