Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Brewers sign Eric Thames (3 years)


jerichoholicninja
Community Moderator
Posted
Came very close to ordering a Thames shirtsey online, will probably happen in the next couple of weeks.

The Brewers just started selling Thames shirseys last night. Adam McCalvy reports that the delay was due to Thames not having signed off on having his name and number on a shirt. His absence from the MLB resulted in his not even thinking about that issue.

Remember: the Brewers never panic like you do.
  • Replies 415
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
The HRs won't keep up obviously but his approach at the plate is at an elite level. He hits the ball with authority. I think he is going to stay an all star caliber player even when he isn't hot anymore.
Posted
The HRs won't keep up obviously but his approach at the plate is at an elite level. He hits the ball with authority. I think he is going to stay an all star caliber player even when he isn't hot anymore.

 

The scariest thing isn't even the HRs it is everything else about his offensive game that is mind boggling.

 

LHPs? .571 AVG

Doesn't swing outside the zone

Doesn't chase the high fastball

Shift? No problem

Power against lefties? 4 HRs in 14 ABs

 

 

One of his last homeruns a lefty threw him some type of breaking pitch(slider?) OFF THE PLATE outside tailing away from him and he casually dumped it over the LF wall. It doesn't make sense. This isn't just some guy hitting some HRs, but deep down is a poor batter. The dude is doing everything. It is almost impossible to try and even rationalize.

Posted
3 random drug tests already this year.

 

The hunt is on!

 

Maybe not blue?

 

Definitely not a blue statement. Clearly they are trying everything to catch Thames if there is anything to catch.

 

Yea. Like I mentioned in the other thread, it seems like MLB is on a witch hunt to catch people. Random tests...twice within a week? Cmon.

 

I'm not up on the latest PED's, which one can make a player not swing at junk outside the zone?

Posted
Just as impressive is that he is on pace for 103 walks and 184 runs. So if pitchers start being more careful with him, Braun and Shaw will have plenty of RBI opportunities.
Posted

Here's something mildly interesting, or at least it surprised me. This is about WAR numbers, so please assume I understand all the caveats about small-sample WAR and take this as fun with stats, for whatever it's worth:

 

This is based on the WAR numbers that ESPN uses, which I assume is bWAR because Fangraphs looks very different. ESPN has Thames at 1.8 oWAR and -0.3 dWAR, so 1.5 total. For 22 games that's obviously impressive -- MVP-level play.

 

Another Brewer, though, has put up 1.4 total WAR (0.8 oWAR + 0.6 dWAR), with only about 60 percent of the PA Thames has gotten. If bWAR is right, then, the Brewers' best player to this point hasn't actually been Eric Thames. It's been . . . Manny Pina.

 

(FWIW, Fangraphs has Thames at 1.9 total WAR and Pina at 0.9.)

Posted
The HRs won't keep up obviously but his approach at the plate is at an elite level. He hits the ball with authority. I think he is going to stay an all star caliber player even when he isn't hot anymore.

 

The scariest thing isn't even the HRs it is everything else about his offensive game that is mind boggling.

 

LHPs? .571 AVG

Doesn't swing outside the zone

Doesn't chase the high fastball

Shift? No problem

Power against lefties? 4 HRs in 14 ABs

 

 

One of his last homeruns a lefty threw him some type of breaking pitch(slider?) OFF THE PLATE outside tailing away from him and he casually dumped it over the LF wall. It doesn't make sense. This isn't just some guy hitting some HRs, but deep down is a poor batter. The dude is doing everything. It is almost impossible to try and even rationalize.

Gotta just enjoy the ride while it lasts. As a point of reference, after Rob Deer had 9 HR in the first 18 games of 1987 and had a slash line of .362/.444/.826/1.271, but finished with .238/.360/.456/.816 (28 HR).

Posted
Well you can quote all kinds of people with hot starts that didn't keep it up, that is why I look at things like out of zone swing rate, swinging strikes, aEV etc. All of the underlying stats that becomes useful data way faster than the traditional stats look like the real deal. In a case like Trevor Story who hit 10 HR last April the background stats screamed fluke.
Posted
Well you can quote all kinds of people with hot starts that didn't keep it up, that is why I look at things like out of zone swing rate, swinging strikes, aEV etc. All of the underlying stats that becomes useful data way faster than the traditional stats look like the real deal. In a case like Trevor Story who hit 10 HR last April the background stats screamed fluke.

This makes sense to me. The one thing I've seen that might cut the other way was in a Fangraphs comment, where the poster showed that Thames has had a very normal distribution of grounders, fly balls, and line drives. His argument was that it's very hard to have a great season with that normal distribution (presumably you want more line drives and fewer fly balls). I don't know whether the premise is correct; I've never seen data on that.

Posted
Here's something mildly interesting, or at least it surprised me. This is about WAR numbers, so please assume I understand all the caveats about small-sample WAR and take this as fun with stats, for whatever it's worth:

 

This is based on the WAR numbers that ESPN uses, which I assume is bWAR because Fangraphs looks very different. ESPN has Thames at 1.8 oWAR and -0.3 dWAR, so 1.5 total. For 22 games that's obviously impressive -- MVP-level play.

 

Another Brewer, though, has put up 1.4 total WAR (0.8 oWAR + 0.6 dWAR), with only about 60 percent of the PA Thames has gotten. If bWAR is right, then, the Brewers' best player to this point hasn't actually been Eric Thames. It's been . . . Manny Pina.

 

(FWIW, Fangraphs has Thames at 1.9 total WAR and Pina at 0.9.)

 

If WAR takes position into consider, I would believe that. 1.000+ OPS for a catcher (anyone really) is pretty good.

Posted
Well you can quote all kinds of people with hot starts that didn't keep it up, that is why I look at things like out of zone swing rate, swinging strikes, aEV etc. All of the underlying stats that becomes useful data way faster than the traditional stats look like the real deal. In a case like Trevor Story who hit 10 HR last April the background stats screamed fluke.

Wasn't saying Thames will drop all the way down to Deer territory, just that this ridiculous hot start will cool off possibly a fair amount. I do like Thames approach, so I don't see extended slumps unless pitchers find a hole in his swing.

 

Thames will regress back to his norm, we just don't know what his norm is just yet. In any event, enjoy the ride while we can.

Posted
More proof that when your best hitter is in the 2nd spot, you will maximize your scoring output all other things being equal.
Posted
Anyone think his hamstring issue was because the Brewers had him running on Braun's full count with one out and Braun kept fouling off pitches so Thames ran to second base about 7 times? Eventually Braun struck out and Thames thrown out.
Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Posted
No homer today. DFA Thames.

 

 

I'm here. :)

"Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power......He probably has a future as a backup infielder if he can stop rolling over to third base and shortstop." Keith Law, 2006
Posted
No homer today. DFA Thames.

 

 

I'm here. :)

 

Twice recently, I've been on time for a sparsely attended meeting and the meeting originator comes in and announces, "Where is everybody?" To which I reply, "What am I? Chopped liver?" The answer both times was "Yes".

 

[sarcasm]Sorry, you don't count.[/sarcasm] ;)

"Rock, sometime, when the team is up against it, and the breaks are beating the boys, tell 'em to go out there with all they got and win just one for the Uecker. I don't know where I'll be then, Rock but I'll know about it; and I'll be happy."

Posted

Getting a little ridiculous. They're not even trying to pretend anymore that there isn't anything fishy about this process.

 

No one gets 'randomly' tested 4 times in a month. Come on.

Posted
Just got his 4th RANDOM test.

 

I thought players could only be tested 3 times a year unless they'd previously failed a test.

 

There's no limit anymore. Still, I'd be all over this if I was the MLBPA. It's clearly not random which I believe is in violation of their joint agreement.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...