Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
Posted

Man if there is one thing I hate it's watching pitches over the heart of the plate. 

Edit - I know Mitchell K'ed on a pitch on the corner but he set himself up poorly that at bat and other at bats tonight. 

Posted

Letting the starting pitcher go 7 innings is not the recipe for beating the Cubs, 

Frankly if I were Counsell I’d send him back out for the 8th.

Posted
Just now, 82brewcrew82 said:

Welp, looks like the Cubs have at least two really good starters.

The crazy thing about their pitching woes is they actually did really good at the deadline in finding starting pitchers.

Posted
1 minute ago, trwi7 said:

Gausman hasn't had a good month since May but he's Cy Young here.

Little unfair. He's been about 50-50 good start-blowup in his last 6 or 7 starts. Threw 7 shutout in a great offensive environment in Arizona. He's been good tonight. Brewers have missed a couple of chances, but they're noticeable because it's been very fine margins.

Posted
1 minute ago, adambr2 said:

The crazy thing about their pitching woes is they actually did really good at the deadline in finding starting pitchers.

What did they have to give up for Gausman?

Posted
1 minute ago, yourout said:

What did they have to give up for Gausman?

I think it was like their #16 and #18 prospects, something like that.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, adambr2 said:

I think it was like their #16 and #18 prospects, something like that.

I know folks hated the May trade, but that's not THAT far off, especially when you consider we also got a bullpen arm. 

Bateman actually is hitting .330 in CF for a Blue Jays team that's now within .5 games of the playoffs.

Good deal for them.

Posted
Just now, Cool Hand Lucroy said:

I know folks hated the May trade, but that's not THAT far off, especially when you consider we also got a bullpen arm. 

Bateman actually is hitting .330 in CF for a Blue Jays team that's now within .5 games of the playoffs.

Good deal for them.

You have to consider the system. The Cubs dealing their #16 and #18 prospects was MUCH different than us doing it. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, adambr2 said:

You have to consider the system. The Cubs dealing their #16 and #18 prospects was MUCH different than us doing it. 

Considering one of the traded guys has already helped his team at the major-league level, I'm not sure I agree with you here. 

Plus, again, we got a whole second major-league contributor.

Posted
Just now, Cool Hand Lucroy said:

Considering one of the traded guys has already helped his team at the major-league level, I'm not sure I agree with you here. 

Plus, again, we got a whole second major-league contributor.

Jojo better be pretty good to justify what we gave up if we’re not going to get better out of May, 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...