Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
Posted
1 hour ago, Frisbee Slider said:

Not sure if I remember any preabitration player forcing themselves out via trade. Seems like a bad faith collective bargaining action to me.

He can’t the Pirates hold all the financial cards until he’s out of minor league options. If Skenes demands a trade now, the Pirates could option him to the minors and his service clock stops. 

Verified Member
Posted

Sorry, Cubs fans:  Newly Elected Pope Leo roots for the White Sox his brother says.  Before he became pope, Chicago-born Robert Prevost was raised in a household of Cubs and Cardinals fans. Yet his alliances were always to the White Sox. 

Posted
41 minutes ago, Frisbee Slider said:

Is this all the evidence we needed to confirm he should not have been on our roster?

Yup, just like Shane Smith. **ducks**

  • WHOA SOLVDD 2

"Go ahead. Try to disagree with me. I dare you." Jeffrey Leonard.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Frisbee Slider said:

Is this all the evidence we needed to confirm he should not have been on our roster?

I dunno, believe White Sox had second shot at him on the waiver wire so may have been a hot commodity

Posted

White Sox probably figured that Smith worked out, so why not assume Brewers brass made another mistake...

This one won't be working out the same I'm afraid.

"I'm sick of runnin' from these wimps!" Ajax - The WARRIORS
Posted
6 minutes ago, Samurai Bucky said:

Hyde out as manager of the Orioles:

 

 

Orioles are a good case of careful what you wish for when it comes to wanting a new owner.

Angelos family had clearly run their course, they finally get a wave of young talent, a new owner, and their big moves are trading for a year of Burnes, then signing Tyler O’Neill and a some ancient SPs.

Still haven’t won a playoff game since 2014 either.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, sveumrules said:

Orioles are a good case of careful what you wish for when it comes to wanting a new owner

Is it that they simply didn’t trade for enough needle movers? They didn’t go big enough?

Blue because I’m skeptical about all in going for it campaigns. 

Posted

I was so confused as that tweet is dated 8/6/24. When parody becomes reality less that a year later. Here is a more official tweet from a more reliable source that Fax Parody.

 

 

Posted
21 hours ago, zurch1818 said:

I was so confused as that tweet is dated 8/6/24. When parody becomes reality less that a year later. Here is a more official tweet from a more reliable source that Fax Parody.

 

 

My bad.  I went to the MLB site and posted that link and since it didn’t show up as embedded, so I found the first thing on Twitter.  My mistake. 

Posted
52 minutes ago, JosephC said:

Should have hired Braun's lawyers, proven performers at finding technicalities to get testosterone abusers out of trouble (at least until the distributor gets busted)!

Braun’s lawyers really didn’t have to do anything in his first case.  MLB didn’t follow the rules that were setup at the time.  The chain of custody for the sample was broken when the tester wasn’t able to transfer the chain of custody of the samples and then placed it in his refrigerator.  Regardless if it was normal SOP for doing this it broke the chain of custody that MLB and MLBPA agreed to.  The samples should have been discarded based on the CBA that was written up and new samples should have been attained.

The second one though Braun wasn’t able to beat.

What I have always found weird is that MLB threw out the others that tested positive but only kept Braun’s results.  His was elevated more in the testing than the others but that still doesn’t make sense that the others were discarded.  I believe it was Pujols and Freese that tested positive and MLB didn’t want to have that hanging over the WS winners and having to explain that.  

  • Like 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, nate82 said:

Braun’s lawyers really didn’t have to do anything in his first case.  MLB didn’t follow the rules that were setup at the time.  The chain of custody for the sample was broken when the tester wasn’t able to transfer the chain of custody of the samples and then placed it in his refrigerator.  Regardless if it was normal SOP for doing this it broke the chain of custody that MLB and MLBPA agreed to.  The samples should have been discarded based on the CBA that was written up and new samples should have been attained.

The second one though Braun wasn’t able to beat.

What I have always found weird is that MLB threw out the others that tested positive but only kept Braun’s results.  His was elevated more in the testing than the others but that still doesn’t make sense that the others were discarded.  I believe it was Pujols and Freese that tested positive and MLB didn’t want to have that hanging over the WS winners and having to explain that.  

The chain of custody was never broken.  A chain of custody is only a record of who had it and where it was from collection to testing.  If it sits in a guy's refrigerator over the weekend, and the guy has it documented that it sat in his refrigerator over the weekend, then the chain of custody is intact.

The technicality was a violation of MLB's protocol, which wasn't a violation of the protocol of the collection agency.  MLB's protocol indicated the sample must be shipped immediately, the collection agency's protocol indicated it could be held over the weekend if stored properly.  It was MLB's responsibility to verify that their protocol matched the protocol of the collection agency, and instruct the collection agency to change their policy, which MLB failed to do.  MLB admitted this was their oversight and the collection agency or the sample collector were not at fault.

There was no "second one."  When he was suspended, it was the result of the Biogenesis investigation, where the documents uncovered in 2013 linked him to his PED usage in 2011.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...