Immaculate Grid Daily Basball Trivia

[tmwiese55]

Yea I thought it was funny yesterday you could use Cruz everywhere.  So it was to save him for last.

I only got 7 today and gave up after 5 or so minutes.    I can't believe I struggled with Phi/Stl so much, especially after seeing the top answer.   Missed Det/Phi too but not surprised I don't know Det well.

[Frisbee Slider]

Got my personal best of 70 rarity score today. 

I am kicking myself because I thought Casey Kotchman was an Angel and Indian but didn’t have the courage to choose him.

[Outlander]

This is the knockoff version of immaculate grid but it is fun trying to remember old Brewers:

 

[jerichoholicninja]

The all awards/statistical achievement one a couple days ago was the worst I've ever done. I haven't paid attention to who wins what for a long time.

[Underachiever]

2 hours ago, Outlander said:

This is the knockoff version of immaculate grid but it is fun trying to remember old Brewers:

 

Jeez, Mieske doesn't rate a picture? Ouch.

[Underachiever]

Okay, this is a mini spoiler, but the fact that Wally Joyner never had 200 hits in a year, nor a career batting average of .300, was stunning to me in the grid today. Cost me dearly when I was doing well up until that row.

[Outlander]

Joyner looked like a future HOFer after 1987 but kind of peaked there. Lots of old timey baseball players to choose from with the Sox and Pirates as teams with 200 hits and 300 batting average.

[Frisbee Slider]

I need to share my joy for utilizing Peter Zoccolillo and both Moutons in today’s grid.

[boringname123]

Still can't believe it happened

 

[CheeseheadInQC]

1 hour ago, Frisbee Slider said:

I need to share my joy for utilizing Peter Zoccolillo and both Moutons in today’s grid.

Man, and I thought my Paciorek pick was good. You beat it on all three 

[tmwiese55]

I went with Marc Newfield .05%, Darryl Hamilton .6%, and Jace Peterson .1%.    You guys win.      My rarity for the day was only 27.  highest ones I had were 8%

[kestrel79]

I went with Jenks, TPlush, and Matt Mieske

[AKCheesehead]

Disappointed in myself for missing it yesterday. A grid like today’s I can’t do much with. 

[Frisbee Slider]

1 hour ago, AKCheesehead said:

Disappointed in myself for missing it yesterday. A grid like today’s I can’t do much with. 

You can go back and complete previous grids now.

[AKCheesehead]

3 hours ago, Frisbee Slider said:

You can go back and complete previous grids now.

Thanks for the heads up! I just used A Milwaukee outfield of rf Dave Nilsson .1%, cf BJ Surhoff .2% and lf Caleb Gindl.04%. Got Arica in lf for atl at .4% too. This would be a great grid but I can’t think of anything rare for Washington right now. 

[Devinep]

15 minutes ago, AKCheesehead said:

Thanks for the heads up! I just used A Milwaukee outfield of rf Dave Nilsson .1%, cf BJ Surhoff .2% and lf Caleb Gindl.04%. Got Arica in lf for atl at .4% too. This would be a great grid but I can’t think of anything rare for Washington right now. 

Sean berry or marquis Grissom 

[Frisbee Slider]

Proud of Santiago Perez for Brewers/Padres:

[CheeseheadInQC]

6 minutes ago, Frisbee Slider said:

Proud of Santiago Perez for Brewers/Padres:

Beat my Newfield, Gerald Williams, Orosco trio by about .2%

[jerichoholicninja]

I really hate the "Country Born In' and "1 Game at this position" additions. The position one is way too easy and the country one is way too hard.

[Frisbee Slider]

Anyone get lower than 0.01% today?

[pitchleague]

This may have been asked previously:  how many of you go researching and looking up rare answers versus just going by memory and trying your best?

 

I’ve only done a few of these (too busy most of the time to do them) but when I have I just go on memory.  I find it more rewarding to see how good my score can be just on memory.

just curious.  

[Frisbee Slider]

Memory, 100%
Seems like a waste of time to cheat 

[Rock hard Brouhard]

I day into the season and was able to use Jackson Chourio!!!

[AKCheesehead]

On 3/29/2024 at 7:29 PM, Frisbee Slider said:

Memory, 100%
Seems like a waste of time to cheat 

Agreed.  And if it's a grid that I have no clue I just guess and oh well.  But then at the end, it'll show the average rarity score for the day.  Like today's I think was somewhere around 6.  How is that possible to make that rarity score without doing serious research, much less have that as the average?  I don't think so.

[Frisbee Slider]

14 minutes ago, AKCheesehead said:

Like today's I think was somewhere around 6.  How is that possible to make that rarity score without doing serious research

I believe the 6 refers to getting six of nine correct,